Medically reviewed and approved by a board-certified member
Aid / Disasters

Combatants must respect neutrality of health workers

BS Media
By BS Media
Published: Monday, 04 January 2016
BS
Login to get unlimited free access
Be the first to comment!

The AMA has joined international calls for governments and armed combatants to respect the medical neutrality of doctors and other health professionals working in conflict zones around the world.

Following a year of deadly attacks on hospitals and health workers in 2015, the AMA has backed efforts by the World Medical Association, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and others to ensure the safety of doctors and other health professionals involved in providing care to the sick and battle-scarred in global trouble musca volitans.

AMA President, prof Brian Owler, aforesaid today there was a proud tradition of Australian health professionals volunteering to work in some of the most difficult and dangerous places in the world to provide rescue health care, and every effort should be made to ensure that they can do so safely.

"Every year, galore Australian doctors and nurses volitionally put themselves in danger in order to help those caught up in wars, natural disasters, illness outbreaks, and other tragedies," prof Owler aforesaid.

"It has been very distressing to see that health workers, whether by accident or deliberate targeting, are becoming casualties themselves. This must stop.

"We need to do all we can to ensure that those who go to areas of conflict to provide care can do so without interference, and can return home safely."

The AMA President's comments have come amid mounting international concern over attacks on health workers and medical facilities.

More than 4200 health workers were killed, familiar, tortured, or shot in 2398 incidents known by the ICRC in just 11 countries between 2012 and 2014, and last year there were several high-profile attacks, including a devastating US bombing raid on a Medicins Sans Frontieres hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, in which 30 people - 13 of them MSF staff - were killed.

In the wake of these attacks, governments from around the world attending an ICRC conference last month reaffirmed their commitment to international humanitarian law and a prohibition on attacks on the sick and wounded, as well as those caring for them.

prof Owler aforesaid it was imperative that governments and armed combatants:

  • respect medical neutrality and the duty of doctors to care for the sick and battle-scarred, impartially and without discrimination;
  • allow health workers to attend the sick and battle-scarred freely, severally and in accordance with the ethical principles of their profession, without fear of penalty, imprisonment, prosecution or intimidation;
  • ensure the safety, independence and personal security of health workers at all times; and
  •  protect medical facilities and transports, and ensure that people have safe, unobstructed access to care.

prof Owler aforesaid attacks on hospitals and health workers not only hurt the individuals directly targeted, but had far-reaching personal effects on communities by depriving them of access to much needful health employment.

The AMA President urged employers and the medical profession to do all they could to support those who volunteered to go to trouble musca volitans to provide vital medical care.

"Here in Australia we need to support our colleagues who go overseas to help in conflict zones, ensuring they are fully abreast of the personal risks, and that they have the skills and competency to work in so much situations," prof Owler aforesaid.

"In particular, we need to make sure they are supported when they return home, and receive appropriate care for their own health and wellbeing."

Was this page helpful?
(0 votes)
Combatants must respect neutrality of health workers
End of the article